MUMBAI: A PIL was filed today in the Madras high court bench seeking to direct the government to take over the management and administration of the Indian Premier League (IPL) and Board of Control for Cricket in India (BCCI) as it had failed to promote the game.

The PIL has alleged that the conduct of certain activities and receipt of income were totally commercial and there was no element of charity in the conduct of the BCCI. The court has sent a notice to the central government, IPL chairman Rajeev Shukla and BCCI president N Srinivasan. They have been asked to respond within two weeks.
 
In his petition, city-based lawyer V Santhakumaresan alleged that conduct of certain activities and receipt of income were totally commercial and there was no element of charity in the conduct of BCCI.

The surplus generated by BCCI was shared with players instead of being used for promoting the game claims the PIL.
 
The court should direct CBI to conduct investigation into the entire affairs relating to sources of income, financial status, betting, and match fixing, lawyer V Santhakumaresan who filed the PIL said. In addition the BCCI should desist from using the name ?Indian cricket team? for its team till disposal of the petition.

MUMBAI:The controversies at the very popular global cricket and cash-rich the Indian Premier League (IPL) continue. Following the spot fixing controversy last week, now it is the turn of one of the franchisees Pune Warriors to pull out of the IPL completely. The multibillion dollar Sahara India group, (whose promoter Subrata Roy is currently battling Sebi and its allegations of alleged fraud) which owned the franchise, announced that it was snapping its association with the IPL. It took this decision following the Board of Control for Cricket in India (BCCI) insistence on encashing Sahara?s bank guarantee after it failed to pay the franchise fee for this year?s edition of the IPL.

Sahara had bought the franchise for a huge Rs 1,700 crore back for 10 years in 2010 and had later asked that the franchisee fee be trimmed as the number of matches had come down from the 94 promised to 64 only.
 
While announcing its withdrawal from the IPL, it said that it was disgusted by the BCCI?s attitude towards it and will not rejoin the league even if the entire franchise fee was waived.

In a statement the company said, "It is a firm and final decision of Sahara to withdraw from IPL."

"In 2010, Sahara had bid Rs 1,700 crore for the IPL franchise on the basis of revenue calculation on 94 matches. It was tricky on the part of BCCI to put the number in media as 94 matches for getting bigger amount. But we got 64 matches only".

Sahara claimed that the BCCI turned a deaf ear to its pleadings for arbitration and reducing the franchise fee.

"We and Kochi Team immediately protested and requested BCCI to reduce the bid price proportionately for a viable IPL proposition. Nothing was heard. We waited with confidence that such a sports body should have sportsmanship spirit."

"We continuously requested BCCI for arbitration from June 2011. But BCCI is only concerned about money and not about the genuine interests of the franchisee. Thus, (when) we could not penetrate BCCI?s deaf ears, we announced our withdrawal in February 2012," it added.

However Sahara will continue to sponsor the Indian cricket team. "There is a very strong urge in us to withdraw from the Indian Cricket Team Sponsorship from today only. But, interest of the players will suffer if we do so."

"We share an excellent relationship with the players and will not want such dedicated and good human beings who serve the country so committed to get harmed financially due to unsporting attitude of BCCI," the Group said.

"So we have given time to BCCI to get the new sponsorship in place from January 2014, as we will continue the national team?s sponsorship only up to December 2013 that?s the expiry date of the present agreement."

The group, however, assured the players and the stakeholders that their dues would be cleared in time.
 
"Sahara assures its players and stakeholders that their Fees and other rightfully due payments will be protected and under no circumstances will they suffer.

"Sahara also assures its sponsors and other supporters who have shown faith in us that their obligations have and will be fulfilled and there will be no compromise on their status or rights," it said.

It may be recalled that Sahara had threatened to pull out earlier over the same issue in 2010 but was persuaded to stay on after Shah Rukh Khan had intervened. With this the two franchises that had arrived around two years ago - Pune and Kochi are gone.

The IPL for now is back to being an eight team affair.
Former commissioner and creator of the IPL Lalit Modi was quite acerbic about the BCCI?s attitude on Twitter.

Tweeted he: "A year ago I had said that Sahara would pull out from the IPL and Indian cricket. BCCI high-handedness is the issue like I said. Sahara is right in doing what they are doing. Sahara did more for Indian cricket than anyone else. If you don?t treat franchisees equal, this is bound to happen. Sahara paid $37 million a year and a new Hyderabad to pay just a few million dollars a year ? off (sic) course one will smell something."

MUMBAI: Today the supreme court rejected a public interest litigation (PIL) to stay the IPL playoff matches until the completion of investigations of the alleged spot-fixing in the tournament. It has, however, given the BCCI a 15-day deadline to conclude its investigation, which is being carried out by cricket?s richest body?s anti-corruption unit head Ravi Sawani.

The supreme court also slammed the BCCI, saying that the spot fixing incidents had taken place due to its lackadaisical approach in reining in the erring players.

An apex court bench of justices B.S. Chauhan and Dipak Misra said that it was incumbent upon the BCCI to maintain and sustain the reputation of the 125-year-old game. The court said, "Definitely there is some kind of irregularity. But the biggest problem is the lackadaisical attitude of the BCCI. It should stop. There has to be some scientific dispassionate and impartial approach to solve these problems."

In its ruling, the court observed that cricket was a gentleman?s game and it should remain as gentleman?s, not tainted, at the same time though it also said that it was not a case for the court to ?interfere and ban matches?.

Social activist Sudarsh Awasti had filed the PIL. He had also sought that the court orders a special investigation team (SIT) probe into the scam.

NEW DELHI: Is the use of the word ?India? in the name of a private association or organisation illegal, unless used with prior sanction of the government?

This is the question that will come up for decision following two complaints filed against the use of ?India? in the name of the Board of Control for Cricket in India (BCCI) and in ?Team India?.

The complaints have been filed in Lucknow by social activists Amitabh and Nutan Thakur to the government under section 5 of the Emblems and Names (Prevention of Improper Use) Act 1950. Both these complaints have been sent to the competent authority, director (Internal Trade Division), Department of Consumer Affairs.

The first complaint is about use of the word India in BCCI and the second about using words "Team India" for BCCI?s cricket teams.

The complainants say section 3 of this Act prohibits use of certain emblems and names, including the word India, without permission from the competent authority. BCCI is a private society under the Tamil Nadu Societies Registration Act, 1975 which always asserts its independence and vehemently denies any official control. Yet it repeatedly uses the word India which suggests the patronage and connection with the Government. Hence it should be punished under section 5 of the Act.

MUMBAI: A public interest litigation (PIL) has been filed in the supreme court. It wants a special investigation team (SIT) to look into the ongoing spot-fixing scandal.

The petitioner has asked for a stay on the tournament until the probe is complete.

The sixth edition of the IPL concludes on Sunday 26 May. Three players from the Rajasthan Royals franchise S Sreesanth, Ankeet Chavan and Ajit Chandila were arrested on charges of spot fixing and are being questioned by the police.

The franchise will file an FIR against the three players. They were advised to do so by the BCCI which convened an emergency meeting. In a statement the franchise said, "We, along with the BCCI and other IPL franchises, take a zero tolerance approach to spot or game fixing. The impact on the game, our team, and our franchise has been devastating. It is critical that this evil is rooted out of the game, and as such we will be filing FIR?s with the Delhi police, based on the information provided. This will ensure that justice is pursued to its most complete end, and that the police are able to appropriately conduct their investigation. The reputational impact on the franchise, our players, our stakeholders, and the game has been immense. The actions must be punished."

The franchise also requested the media to show due restraint in the reporting of the events as it relates to its other players. The enforcement directorate (ED) reports indicate will also probe the spot-fixing case to find out if there was any money laundering involved.

Meanwhile the BCCI in damage control mode has decided that all cricketers? agents will now need to be accredited to the BCCI while an anti-corruption official of the board will be assigned to each IPL team.

In addition an anti-graft official will accompany the Indian cricket team to England for the Champions Trophy which kicks off on 6 June 2013.