NEW DELHI: SS Music channel, renamed as SS TV, has been suspended for seven days from 15 to 22 February and transmission or retransmission of the channel on any platform throughout India.

The central government passed this order following the order of 28 November last by the Division Bench of the Madras High Court validating the suspension of the South India-based SS Music Channel.

The Court had, according to the Information and Broadcasting Ministry, directed for a fresh period of suspension. Hence, the Ministry order.

Earlier on 16 November 2010, the Ministry had under Section 20(2) of the Cable Television Networks (Regulation) Act 1995 issued an Order prohibiting transmission or re-transmission of this channel on any platform throughout India with effect from 22 to 29 November 2010 following the telecast of ?Sizzling Hits? on 25 March 2010 and 10 April 2010 in violation of the Programme Code.

The channel had thereafter filed a Writ Petition in the Madras High Court challenging the order, and got a stay from a single judge on 19 November 2010.

Subsequently, single judge bench on 7 December 2010 allowed the petition filed by SS Music Channel and set aside the Order of the ministry, against which an appeal was filed before a division bench which admitted it for hearing on 21 March 2011.

In the meanwhile, the name of the TV channel had been changed from ?SS Music? to ?SS TV? after seeking permission from the Ministry.

NEW DELHI: There has been no direct recruitment in the Group ?A? cadres since Prasar Bharati was set up as an autonomous corporation in 1997. The Union Public Service Commission (UPSC) refused to hold Departmental Promotion Committee (DPC) meetings between 1997 and 2002 as the pubcaster was an autonomous body.

A large number of pending court cases compounded the problem, apart from the fact that service rules did not exist for many of the posts.

A total of 3452 posts, including operation and maintenance staff, have been identified as essential posts for filling up on priority basis and the Group of Ministers has approved a proposal for filling these posts in consultation with the Finance Ministry.

Also, even 40 years after the service was established, no permanent staffer has been recruited in the senior administrative grade of the Indian Broadcasting (Programme) Service set up specifically for All India Radio and Doordarshan.

Information and Broadcasting Ministry sources admitted to indiantelevision.com that of the sanctioned strength of 642 in the IB(P)S, only 500 had been filled apart from 94 officers taken on ad-hoc basis in the junior time cale.

The sanctioned strengthened in the other posts is: 97 in the Junior Administrative Grade of which four have been filled, and 265 in the Senior Time Scale of which 231 are vacant.

The IB(P)S had been conceived by then Information and Broadcasting Minister V N Gadgil especially to have trained manpower in AIR and DD and reduce dependence on the Indian Information Service which continues to dominate the manpower in Prasar Bharati.

The situation is even worse in the News Services Division of AIR, which has a total regular manpower of 26 against a sanctioned strength of 104.

Among Group ?A? services in All India Radio, there has been no recruitment in the post of Announcer Grade I which has a sanction of 20 posts, none in Music composer Grade I which has a sanction for two posts, none of news reader-cum-translator Grade I which has a sanction for 20 posts, none for Deputy Director (Audience Research) against the sanction of six posts, none for Translator-cum-announcer in Indian Languages or Foreign Language in Grade I which have sanction for one and seven posts respectively.

There are 32 vacancies against 72 sanctioned posts for instrumentalist Grade I, one Director and one Joint Director (Audience Research) against two posts in each category, 42 Audience Research Officers against 54 sanctioned posts, and one Supervisor against 15 sanctioned posts.

In addition to the normal functioning of Prasar Bharati, there is a total requirement of 8018 personnel for the newly sanctioned projects in the pubcaster. The total number of persons required for Operation and Maintenance of the new posts is 2183 for AIR and 5,835 for DD.

NEW Delhi: Arun Kumar Jain, Member (Finance), has once again run into trouble with the Prasar Bharati, with its Board recommending his removal.

A meeting of the Board is understood to have agreed on forwarding this proposal to the Information and Broadcasting Ministry. He has been charged with indiscipline.

However, since Jain is a member of the Indian Administrative Service in the 1977 batch from the Nagaland cadre, the proposal will have to go to the Department of Personnel and Training.

This is not the first time that Jain has run into trouble with the Board, since he has been consistently raising objections to the way finance is managed in the pubcaster.

He had been asked in March 2009 ? when B S Lalli was the chief executive officer - to go back to his parent cadre or quit the IAS. This happened after he had written a series of letters to the then CEO and other members about financial irregularities.

In June that year, the Delhi High Court stayed the Central Administrative Tribunal?s order directing Jain to either resign from IAS for absorption in the public broadcaster or revert to his parent cadre. Justice Veena Birabal passed the stay order on the petition of Jain challenging the verdict of the Tribunal.

Early last year soon after Rajiv Takru (Additional Secretary in the I&B Ministry) assumed charge after the suspension of Lalli, the Board decided to form a three-member finance committee to handle the financial matters of the pubcaster, and Jain was asked to cleaning up the internal accounts.

Following this, Jain had approached the Delhi High Court against the Board?s decision to divest him of his powers and vesting powers of CEO to the nominated member, Takru. Jain had said that the appointment of Takru, who is two years junior to Jain, was ?illegal and in contravention of the Prasar Bharati Act? as the Board has no powers to appoint a CEO.

The Court issued notice to the Board in May 2011, and the hearing is continuing, with the case coming up later this week.

NEW DELHI: While reiterating that a comprehensive bill is being brought to amend the Prasar Bharati (Broadcasting Corporation of India) Act 1995 to ensure smoother functioning, the Government has made it clear that this was not aimed at curbing the powers of the chief executive officer.

Information and Broadcasting Ministry sources admitted to indiantelevision.com, however, that the move towards amending the Bill was based on the recommendations of the V K Shunglu Committee which had studied the Commonwealth Games scam relating to outsourcing the telecasts and the recommendations of the Group of Ministers in this regard.

The Government had in October planned to bring forward the amendments in the form of an Ordinance, but had decided to hold it back in view of the amendment in the Act to treat all employees in service as on 5 October 2007 as deemed employees. Furthermore, it was felt that there should be greater inter-ministerial discussion on all aspects before the comprehensive amendments are brought forward.

Information and Broadcasting Minister Ambika Soni during the discussion on the Prasar Bharati (Amendment) Bill in Parliament had assured that a comprehensive legislation would be forward as early as possible.

The Ministry has done a comprehensive review of the provisions of the Prasar Bharati Act and has recommended certain amendments to the Act, which have been approved by the Law Ministry.

Acting against the then CEO BS Lalli had proved to be a long process with the Ministry approaching the President through the Prime Minister and the apex court appointing a Judge to probe the charges.

The amendments also aim at simplifying this process and by instituting a three-member panel comprising the Vice -President, Chairman of the Press Council of India and a nominee of the government, currently responsible for appointments of top officials ? to take action in such cases.

Inefficiency, indiscipline and misbehaviour are also sought to be added as grounds for removal of a CEO, or the DGs of All India Radio and Doordarshan, apart from the permanent members of the Prasar Bharati Board.

The GoM in particular made recommendations regarding the relationship between the Government and Prasar Bharati and the CEO and the Prasar Bharati Board.

Not merely that, but the GoM had also recommended addition of two more permanent members: Member (Technical) and Member (Marketing).

Earlier last year, the GoM also studied the recommendations of a Committee of four joint secretaries on disparity in pay scales of Prasar Bharati employees and also made some recommendations with regard to the waiver of some dues from Prasar Bharati. The Committees for studying the amendments to the Act and the pay scale anomalies had been formed by the GoM headed by P Chidambaram in June 2010.

The GoM had also given its recommendations on the Prasar Bharati Board?s proposal that the Government should meet 100 per cent of the expenses on salaries and allowances of the employees and 50 per cent of operating expenses of Prasar Bharati, while the pubcaster will meet the balance 50 per cent of the operating expenses.

The existing provision requires Prasar Bharati to generate at least 50 per cent of its operating expenses as commercial revenue.

The GoM wanted an amendment in Section 11 of the Act to settle issues regarding various categories of employees in the pubcaster. I had also felt that 3452 essential posts should be filled immediately.

It wanted restoration of Section 22 to provide for income tax exemption. Loans provided by the Government should be converted into grants-in-aid, the GoM said.

There was also a proposal for a complete waiver of the accumulated arrears of space segment and spectrum charges of the pubcaster up to 31 March 2011. While All India Radio owed Rs 2.111.1 billion, Doordarshan owed Rs 10.9391 billion on account of Space segment and Spectrum Charges. (AIR and DD owe Rs 324 million and Rs 4.4728 billion as spectrum charges respectively. Similarly, DD and AIR have to pay Rs 6.4663 billion and Rs 1.7871 billion as Space Segment charges.)

However, a Parliamentary Committee had recently deplored the fact that neither the Parliamentary Committee nor the Broadcasting Council envisaged in the Prasar Bharati (Broadcasting Corporation of India) Act 1990 have been constituted even 15 years after the Act came in force in 1997.

The Standing Committee for Communications and Information Technology deplored the fact that even in the amendments to the Act placed before the Group of Ministers, there is no mention of either setting up these two bodies or deleting the sections relating to them in the original Act.

The Sengupta Committee report of August 1996 and the Narayanmurthy Committee Report of 20 May 2000 had said there is no need for these provisions in the light of Standing and Consultative Committees of Parliament.

NEW DELHI: Information and Broadcasting Ministry is keeping a check on all the international channels that are downlinking in India.

The ministry sources told indiantelevision.com that the Electronic Media Monitoring Cell (EMMC) is closely monitoring all the 89 channels from abroad which had so far been permitted to downlink in India.

Of these channels, 33 channels are beaming exclusively in English while another 33 are beaming in English, Hindi and one or more regional languages.

While 15 are beaming in English and Hindi, two channels are in Japanese and English, two in French, and one each in Korean-English, German-English, Tamil, and Hindi.

Since the channels are beamed by companies having a registered office in India, they are also covered under the Cable TV Networks (Regulations) Act 1995, the Inter-Ministerial Committee which is empowered to act on complaints as well as suo motu, and the self-regulation mechanisms of the private channels - the Broadcasting Content Complaints Council, and the News Broadcasting Regulatory Authority.